Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Final Exam - Perceptions

Jan. 17, 2012. President Obama unexpectedly runs into the First Lady on her birthday in the basement of the White House.

                The image I chose is of Barack and Michelle Obama in the basement of the White House on her birthday. It is from Time Magazine’s Light Box 2012 Year in Review. What caught my eye about this picture was how quaint and pleasant it was, and how that related to the caption. This image is an important contemporary American artifact because it illustrates the emphasis on perception in our society by displaying an appealing idea of President Obama.
            At first glance, the perfect angles and black and white effect have it resembling a scene from an old movie. It looks casual and plausible for every day, but in somewhat of a staged way. The caption is interesting because it calls the meeting “unexpected.” Considering that there was a cameraman already down there, figuring out the perfect angle to shoot at, it probably wasn't as unexpected as the caption suggests. I believe this image was taken with the desire to portray Obama as just a “regular guy,” the ideal, relatable and down to earth man that always makes time for his family. Not to say he isn't this man, but it seems that with this image that persona is being specifically highlighted.
            This reminded me of a class discussion we had months ago, about Reagan and how his campaign commercials were very “down home,” attempting to appeal to the general audience as a friendly, All-American, regular guy you could walk up to. We discussed that in the US, the idea of candidates identifying with the population, rather than being above them, has become very valued. Most people wouldn’t want to vote for a stuffy man who flaunts his riches and high education. All presidents are highly educated and many have been rich, but it’s important to tone that down to appeal to the masses. More recently, we also discussed a picture of Obama in the 2008 election, standing during a speech in front of not 1, but 8 American flags. At that time, there was some controversy about him not being “American enough,” so he was trying very hard to debunk that idea and get the American population to perceive him as very patriotic. In all of these cases, it’s all about perception and the desire to be painted in a good light.
            Moving away from politics, this idea of perception has been apparent in many other things we’ve examined this year. While reading the 3 different editions of Frederick Douglas, there were countless instances where Douglass changed his wording with each new publication. In his second edition, while describing his altercation with Mr. Covey, he says, “The man had obtained complete control over me” (Douglass, 100.) However, in the third edition, he uses this same sentence, but instead changes “man” to “monster.”  He seemed to have wanted to change the feel of this section, to inject more emotion into it and make it more powerful. At the time he was writing this, he wanted to show people how terrible slavery was, and get people to feel negatively towards the perpetrators. The word “monster” is more effective at getting an idea and image across than just “man.” By dehumanizing Covey, Douglass was showing us how monstrous these actions inflicted on him were. By swapping certain words for more powerful ones, Douglass was creating the perception of a more emotional, probably more accurate experience that he went through.
            The final text I applied this idea to was the short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas.” The town in the story, Omelas, has a very shiny, perfect exterior. However, to maintain that utopia, a child must be kept living in the dark and filth forever. While this is not kept a secret, this fact is generally ignored by the people and attempted to be put out of mind. This town is perceived to be perfect in every way possible, but it isn't how it seems when you go deeper. Omelas is obviously taking this idea of perception to extreme lengths compared to the previous examples, but it ties in with the general theme. In all these examples, an authoritative figure decides what kind of name they want to make for themselves or their work. Exaggerated or not, perception is extremely important because it encompasses how society views someone or one’s work, and is the basis for all ideas and opinions.


Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Locator Chips at School

           Today an article  came out about a Texas school that is requiring student to wear locator chips while they are on school property. The school is claiming they put this measure in place so they could ensure that all kids are in their class when the bell rings. This seems like a pretty crazy measure to take just for this purpose. Imagine how much money, time and energy is being wasted when they would simply have hall monitors roaming the hallways if this is really such a big and important problem for them. Putting this rule in place of course brought a lot of controversy and media attention. Many people and groups are speaking out against it because they believe it is intrusive and a breach of privacy. The school is taking this new requirement very seriously. When a girl protested and refused to wear the chip, they said they would expel her.Where do you draw the line when it comes to a student's privacy? This article got me thinking about previous instances such as this one  when schools have had access to student's Facebook accounts and other personal information.

             In your opinion, where do you think the line should be drawn when it comes to schools and students' privacy? Is this situation, considering the locator chips do only work inside the school building, appropriate or not? Even if you don't think it's too much of a privacy invasion, is it really necessary? Answer in the comments below!

Monday, January 7, 2013

#cut4bieber

             Last week, pictures of Justin Bieber smoking weed at a party surfaced on the Internet.A disturbing new trend surfaced on Twitter today as a result of this. You might have heard about it already, its called #cut4bieber. Originally thought to be real, this is a hashtag where people, supposedly teenage girls, have been posting pictures of their cut wrists in protest of Justin's actions, saying they will continue to cut themselves until he stops smoking. It turns out that it was actually a prank started by a website called 4Chan. Some people on that website created fake Twitter accounts and posted pictures of cut wrists. This was created to be some sort of sick prank, an attempt to “get some little girls to cut themselves." Hopefully their prank wasn't successful and didn't cause any kids to actually cut themselves, but its unclear which pictures are real and which are fake. This prank, besides having a terribly mean hearted motive, is just so disrespectful to the real issue of self harm going on with kids today in the real world. People are even starting to parody the hashtag, posting pictures of their wrists with ketchup smeared on them. This is making the real issue of self abuse into a big joke. Many people are now speaking out about all of this, calling it completely disgusting and disrespectful to people that really have these problems. This issue should never be taken light heartedly, and should definitely not be used as a prank to get kids to really cut themselves.



            What, if anything, do you think should be done about this? Should Justin Bieber come out and do/say something himself about the matter? Should the website that started the prank be closed down, or would that be a breach of freedom of press/speech? When people are doing things this terrible, disrespectful and dangerously influential online, when can action be taken without inappropriately suspending civil rights?